《你不知道的杰克》(You Don't Know Jack)全1集[HDTV]
![《你不知道的杰克》(You Don't Know Jack)全1集[HDTV]](/Uploads/26/260/260692.jpg)
电驴资源
| 用户共享的电驴资源列表 | |
|---|---|
| [你不知道的杰克].you.dont.know.jack.2010-chgrp.cd1.avi | 699.80 MB |
| [你不知道的杰克].you.dont.know.jack.2010-chgrp.cd2.chs.ass | 366.69 KB |
| 700.16 MB | |
电驴资源简介
简介:
/thumb.jpg)
【类型】： 剧情
【影片长度】： 120m
【集数】： 1集
【字幕】： 中文
【服务器】：随机
【分享时间】：7x24
【内容介绍】：
本片根据Jack Kevorkian真实故事改编。
Jack Kevorkian，美国内科医生，其一生都在为病人争取安乐死的权利。正如他的名言:死亡不是犯罪，他帮助至少130个垂死病人走像了生命的终点。1999年Jack Kevorkian被控二级谋杀成立，并于同年入狱。经过8年的监狱生涯，于2007年释放。
本片叙述了Jack Kevorkian为其病人争取死亡的权利所作的种种努力。
Dr. Jack Kevorkian (1928 - ) in the 1990s, when he defies Michigan law assisting the suicide of terminally-ill persons. Support comes from his sister, a lab tech, the Hemlock Society president, and a lawyer. The child of survivors of the Armenian genocide interviews applicants: his sister video tapes them. He assembles a device allowing a person to initiate a three-chemical intravenous drip. The local D.A., the governor, and the Legislature respond. In court scenes, Kevorkian is sometimes antic. He's single-minded about giving dying individuals the right to determine how their lives will end. He wants the Supreme Court to rule. He picks a fight he can't win: is it hubris or heroism?
【类型】： 剧情
【影片长度】： 120m
【集数】： 1集
【字幕】： 中文
【服务器】：随机
【分享时间】：7x24
【内容介绍】：
本片根据Jack Kevorkian真实故事改编。
Jack Kevorkian，美国内科医生，其一生都在为病人争取安乐死的权利。正如他的名言:死亡不是犯罪，他帮助至少130个垂死病人走像了生命的终点。1999年Jack Kevorkian被控二级谋杀成立，并于同年入狱。经过8年的监狱生涯，于2007年释放。
本片叙述了Jack Kevorkian为其病人争取死亡的权利所作的种种努力。
Dr. Jack Kevorkian (1928 - ) in the 1990s, when he defies Michigan law assisting the suicide of terminally-ill persons. Support comes from his sister, a lab tech, the Hemlock Society president, and a lawyer. The child of survivors of the Armenian genocide interviews applicants: his sister video tapes them. He assembles a device allowing a person to initiate a three-chemical intravenous drip. The local D.A., the governor, and the Legislature respond. In court scenes, Kevorkian is sometimes antic. He's single-minded about giving dying individuals the right to determine how their lives will end. He wants the Supreme Court to rule. He picks a fight he can't win: is it hubris or heroism?